No Benefits? No Scholarship. New Proposal from the Progress Party

Velle does not specify a list of "unprofitable" fields, suggesting instead that social partners should define the criteria and that Norway should follow the Danish model of monitoring graduates' employment one year after graduation. He argues that this solution is a tool of public policy aimed at labor market needs, without interfering with individuals' autonomy in choosing their studies.

He emphasizes that the goal is a realistic assessment of the usefulness of education and to avoid situations where graduates face limited employment prospects after finishing their studies. At the same time, he stresses the importance of holding a debate without labeling specific fields as "useless."

Simen Velle, FrP's representative on the Storting's Education Committee, advocates for breaking off research cooperation with countries with which Norway does not cooperate on security matters. He mentioned, among others, China, Iran, and Russia. He argues this is necessary to protect national interests and limit risks associated with the flow of knowledge in sensitive areas.

He believes that public research funding should be directed toward projects that strengthen the country in a practical and tangible way for citizens. He frames this position within the principle of setting clear boundaries for universities while maintaining broad academic freedom within those limits.

Velle also draws attention to student-related issues, such as raising income and asset thresholds before reducing benefits. This is intended to address cost pressures among students who take up work. The new MP, former leader of the FrP youth wing, emphasizes that he supports dialogue aimed at renewing Norwegian education and science.